Skip to content
SA Press
SA News

DFFE distances itself from Hout Bay helicopter accident during firefighting operations

The DFFE has confirmed that a helicopter accident during Hout Bay firefighting operations was not linked to its contracts, saying the aircraft was deployed under a SANParks arrangement.

SA Press||2 min read
Share
DFFE distances itself from Hout Bay helicopter accident d... - South African South African news

Department confirms chopper was not operating under its contract

The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) has moved to clarify that a helicopter accident during firefighting operations on the slopes of Hout Bay was not connected to any of its contractual arrangements. The incident, which took place on Wednesday, 25 March 2026, in the Table Mountain National Park area, prompted immediate concern from the department.

The chopper, operated by Kishugu Aviation, came down while assisting with wildfire suppression efforts in the area. Emergency medical teams were rapidly dispatched to the scene, and Wilderness Search and Rescue (WSAR) was activated to assist. Fortunately, the pilot was confirmed to be safe following the incident.

In a formal statement released on Thursday, the DFFE provided clarity on its relationship with the aviation company involved. The department holds a five-year contract with the Kishugu Joint Venture, which includes Kishugu Aviation, to run its Working on Fire Programme. This initiative delivers vital aerial firefighting capacity on land managed by the DFFE and, where required, extends support to firefighting efforts in surrounding communities.

Aircraft was deployed under SANParks agreement

Despite this existing partnership, the department was unequivocal that the Hout Bay incident had nothing to do with its operations. Officials stressed that the helicopter was fulfilling duties under an entirely separate arrangement at the time of the accident.

"The department confirms that, at the time of the incident, the helicopter was deployed under a separate contractual arrangement and was not undertaking work on behalf of DFFE. The aircraft was operating under a contract with South African National Parks (SANParks)."

The distinction is significant, as it places operational responsibility for the helicopter's deployment squarely with SANParks rather than the DFFE. The department appeared keen to ensure public understanding of the boundaries between its Working on Fire Programme activities and those conducted under other agencies' contracts.

The DFFE also extended its best wishes to the pilot, expressing hope for a swift and full recovery. The department took the opportunity to praise all firefighting crews and emergency responders who have been battling the wildfire on the Hout Bay slopes, acknowledging the dangerous conditions under which they operate.

Wildfires on the Cape Peninsula remain a persistent threat, particularly during dry and windy conditions, and aerial support is considered essential in containing blazes across the rugged mountain terrain of the Table Mountain National Park.

South Africans who rely on aerial firefighting during the Cape's increasingly severe wildfire seasons should note how contractual distinctions between government agencies can affect accountability and response coordination. With the pilot safe but questions lingering about oversight, the incident may prompt SANParks and the DFFE to review how contracted aviation resources are managed across overlapping jurisdictions. Clearer operational frameworks could strengthen emergency response efficiency as the Western Cape braces for continued wildfire risk in the months ahead.

Source: SA News

Published by SA Press

Share

Related Stories